[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch |
Date: |
22 Jan 2001 18:14:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
Pavel> By using the modern features, such as "use strict" and "my" you
Pavel> can write much better code. The patch follows.
Please, Pavel, make your patch relative to the *latest* patch I sent,
and accept the previous ones. There is no point in working two
different branches. Let's go forward, and let's stop this ridiculous
loss of time on the way we walk. The only thing that matters is
*where* we go.
I have made steps _forward_, please, step in my tracks.
- 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/21
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Pavel Roskin, 2001/01/22
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/22
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Pavel Roskin, 2001/01/22
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/22
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/22
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/23
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Russ Allbery, 2001/01/23
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/23
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Pavel Roskin, 2001/01/23
- Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/22