[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.ne
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
[Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net. |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2007 23:32:32 -0700 |
Hi, I'm sending two independent ideas in one email here. I'm not sure
that's wise -- feel free to respond using separate mails :-).
1. Does anyone have the resources to set up an automated conversion
site? That is, a website that accepts MP3 files and gives you back
an Ogg Vorbis file? Although I ask "anyone", I guess "the FSF" is
the likeliest candidate to do this.
An automated converter (for both MP3 and WAV) would make things a
lot easier for people. I understand there may be some technical
difficulty going from MP3 to Ogg Vorbis without compromising
quality, but don't know how severe that problem is -- is it a
showstopper?
When I mentioned this idea to a friend (Seth Schoen), he worried
there might be copyright concerns, similarly to how YouTube got hit
with infringement suits on the grounds that in order to convert
video data to their streaming format, they had to first make a copy
of the data, and making that copy was already an infringement. (!)
I don't know if there's any real legal risk here, but there's a big
difference between a hosting site and a conversion site that gives
you back something that you then host yourself. So perhaps if the
converter had some form the user clicks on that to certify that she
has the legal right to whatever data she's converting, that would
be protection enough. (I Am Not A Lawyer, etc.)
2. A while ago -- before the playogg.org campaign was started, but
after http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-audio-format-matters.html
was posted -- I wrote to address@hidden asking that radio4all.net
link to that article and encourage their uploaders to use Ogg
Vorbis. (See my mail below.)
I never got a response. Does anyone here have any contacts at
radio4all.net? It would be great to get them on board here.
By the way, Mark Weaver suggested that when writing radio4all.net,
it would be good to mention that "Democracy Now!" makes their audio
available in Ogg Vorbis format (in addition to MP3). Since
"Democracy Now!" is a very well-respected program among independent
media activists in the U.S., their use of Ogg Vorbis gives the
campaign legitimacy. That's a foot in the door we should use
whenever it might help.
-Karl
Below is the message I sent to radio4all.net:
From: Karl Fogel <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Cc: Mark Weaver <address@hidden>,
Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
Subject: Encouraging radio uploaders to use Ogg Vorbis format.
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:09:21 -0700
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
Hi, I got your email address from Mark Weaver and Richard Stallman.
We'd like to ask radio4all.net to encourage people who upload radio
programs to offer Ogg Vorbis format. We've written an article to
explain to them why this is important:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-audio-format-matters.html
Would you be willing to link to that article in a fairly visible way,
from the "Add Program" page? That's this page:
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php?op=add-program&session=blah
Above, I've written "blah" instead of the long session ID that's
present when one is logged into the site :-), but you probably
recognize the page -- it's the one that begins:
Submit Audio: Step 1
How many file segments do you want to add? [ ]
If you have a long program or a program in stereo or at high
bitrates, you may want to upload it in several smaller
segments. (Find file splitter software for for MP3 and Ogg Vorbis)
How do you want to add these files?:
* Upload files to this server. [ ]
* Add links to files already located on an FTP/Web server. [ ]
As you can see, the page already mentions Ogg Vorbis. What would be
great would be a bold notice right beneath that (that is, right before
the "How many file segments do you want to add?" line) saying
something like this:
If you've never created Ogg Vorbis files before, please consider
doing so -- it's easy, and Ogg Vorbis has some important advantages
over MP3. Please [see here] for more information.
(I just came up with that wording off the top of my head, by the way,
edit it however you see fit.)
The "[see here]" link could either go to the article at the FSF site,
or to a copy of the article on radio4all.net, since you might not want
to lead people off-site.
This would expose radio producers to the idea that not all formats are
equally free, and would help out Ogg Vorbis a lot. Thoughts?
Thank you for your time,
-Karl Fogel
- [Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net.,
Karl Fogel <=
- Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net., Alexandro Colorado, 2007/05/29
- Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net., Pandu E Poluan, 2007/05/29
- Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net., Matthew Flaschen, 2007/05/29
- Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net., Benj. Mako Hill, 2007/05/29
- Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net., Andreas K. Foerster, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Two thoughts: automated conversion, and radio4all.net., Matthew Flaschen, 2007/05/30