[Savannah-dev] Re: [DotGNU]SourceForge drifting

[David Sugar]

What I would envision is that anyone, a university, a company, or
whatever, could setup their own Savannah locally if they wish.  They would
take care of backups on their own as they see fit.  The only
interconnection between Savannah sites would be thru search/directory
sites.  This makes it simple, and gives anyone who wants it local control.

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Matthew Copeland wrote:

>
> The big problem with a distributed architecture wuith regards to project
> maintenance is handling data backups.  One of the big bonuses of
> centralization of source code is easy backup.  If everything is
> distrubted, you have to worry about your local group doing proper backups.
> So, if you went a distrubted route, it would probably be a good idea to
> make it so that data automatically migrates between servers to a series of
> master servers that have the diskspace and the backup equipment to back it
> all up, or provide as part of the installation describe how to do all of
> the backups.
>
> Matthew M. Copeland
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Bill Lance wrote:
>
> >
> > --- Loic Dachary <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > David Sugar writes:
> >
> > > can sit on top of it
> > >  > would meet everyone's needs very well.  I also
> > > think much of the work
> > >  > that has gone into Savannah will eventually make
> > > this become reality.
> > >
> >
> > What state is Savannah in now?  Could it be
> > distributed in its current architechure?
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
> > http://personals.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> >
>
>