Re: SMuFL Bravura

[Malte Meyn]

Am 01.04.19 um 21:12 schrieb Urs Liska:
> I fully agree with all of that, but I think what Johan wanted to say is that we 
> should *first* work towards DMuFL compliance before spending manpower on 
> Emmentaler extensions.
> Which I think is true and not. If there is someone willing to spend efforts 
> adding stuff to Emmentaler that's a great thing and shouldn't be discouraged 
> because we have even more pressing things to do.

That sounds reasonable. And maybe I should try to make some 
contributions for SMuFL (renaming and rearranging glyphs should be not 
too hard). But that probably should wait until the release of 2.20.0 and 
2.21.0, shouldn’t it?