lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SMuFL Bravura


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: SMuFL Bravura
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:56:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1


Am 02.04.19 um 09:48 schrieb Malte Meyn:


Am 02.04.19 um 09:34 schrieb Urs Liska:
But that probably should wait until the release of 2.20.0 and 2.21.0, shouldn’t it?

I don't think so. Of course such a fundamental change doesn't belong in 2.20, but adding stuff to the development branch doesn't seem problematic to me. If it should turn out that starting with these changes imposes any risk of breaking stuff we could still work on a branch for a longer time (and maybe merge that to 2.21 after a 2.20 release).

An extra branch is a good idea. I thought of people who want to use the new features introduced in 2.21.0 but not 2.20.0 (there probably will be a lot of those), therefore I’d add changes to master only after the release of 2.21.0 (i. e. 2.21.1 would be the earliest possible release for big SMuFL changes).


Ah that's why you asked. No, adding stuff to the development branch will *not* go into 2.20 anymore, that has already been forked. For any new commits to be included in 2.20 David Kastrup would have to manually pick them (which would simply not be done in this case).

Urs




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]