[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ) |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 07:25:11 -0800 (PST) |
--- Adam Treat <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 03:48 am, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > --- Neil Cawse <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Should we be waiting for Binge from qt# project -
> > > or Gopal your stuff?
> >
> > I dont want to wait.
>
> Uh, Binge is producing compilable code and I dare you to find cleaner
>
> generated code. It is also been designed to allow the seemless
> generation of
> other wrappers/bindings. We are nearly done and fully expect to have
> a full
> fledged binge by the end of the week and a new release of Qt# by the
> new
> year.
>
So where are the links? This the C++ stuff from manyasu?
Also is this for C, c++? Please provide more information.
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/08
- [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Neil Cawse, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ),
James Michael DuPont <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Sugar, 2002/12/06