[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )
From: |
Adam Treat |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ) |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:40:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.7 |
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:25 am, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> --- Adam Treat <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 December 2002 03:48 am, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > > --- Neil Cawse <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > Should we be waiting for Binge from qt# project -
> > > > or Gopal your stuff?
> > >
> > > I dont want to wait.
> >
> > Uh, Binge is producing compilable code and I dare you to find cleaner
> >
> > generated code. It is also been designed to allow the seemless
> > generation of
> > other wrappers/bindings. We are nearly done and fully expect to have
> > a full
> > fledged binge by the end of the week and a new release of Qt# by the
> > new
> > year.
>
> So where are the links? This the C++ stuff from manyasu?
> Also is this for C, c++? Please provide more information.
Binge is in our cvs repository on sourceforge under the 'qtsharp' module. It
lives in /qtsharp/src/binge. Yes, this is the C++ stuff from manyoso (I am
manyoso aka Adam Treat ;). It is made to work for C++ as the xml api dtd is
made for C++. Have a look and you can find me on #dotgnu as always.
Cheers,
Adam
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/08
- [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Neil Cawse, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ),
Adam Treat <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Sugar, 2002/12/06