|
From: | Joshua O'Madadhain |
Subject: | Re: [Swarm-Modelling] Crichton's "Prey" |
Date: | Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:55:58 -0500 |
On 3 Jun 2005, at 12:12, Steve Railsback wrote:
North, Michael wrote:Steve: I'd argue that collections of independent agents, interacting locallywith a changing set of neighbors, can learn without evolution, although this depends on what you identify as the "agents." If you define agentsas people, then human social systems learn this way. However, if you define agent as memes or ideas then the learning requires birth and death.So- maybe if the agents themselves are pretty smart? That was ambiguous in the novel- the agents were not described clearly but seemed to be evolved microchips with wings and eyes.
Using terms like "smart" may be confusing in this context. As Michael implied, there are basically two options, depending on whether the individual agents are mutable or immutable. If each agent is immutable--that is, its capabilities and characteristics are fixed--then it can't learn, and learning can only take place by replacing unfit agents with better ones. If each agent is mutable, then it can change its state based on its inputs (what it "sees", etc.)--that is, it can learn.
Joshuaaddress@hidden Per Obscurius...www.ics.uci.edu/ ~jmadden Joshua O'Madadhain: Information Scientist, Musician, Philosopher- At-Tall It's that moment of dawning comprehension that I live for--Bill Watterson My opinions are too rational and insightful to be those of any organization.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |