[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-mediagoblin] calling all people with uber license-fu--we nee
From: |
Brett Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Social-mediagoblin] calling all people with uber license-fu--we need you! |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:11:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:22:17PM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> One issue that Will brought up was... oh, I'll just copy-paste here
> again.
>
> <willkg> paroneayea: oh. what about the GNU MediaGoblin logo or other
> branding assets? are we going to have any in the tarball that gets
> released?
> <paroneayea> yeah those will be CC0 also, I think?
> <paroneayea> I really am not too terribly attached to the GNU MediaGoblin
> logo. I think it's fine for it to be CC0.
> <willkg> so, branding assets as CC0 seems funky since then anyone can use it
> for anything and because it's branding, it's something we want
> specifically associated with us.
> <willkg> so that's why i asked.
> <paroneayea> hm.
> <willkg> we don't really have any branding assets, yet.
> <paroneayea> Okay, I'll bring it up on list.
> <willkg> good idea, my liege!
>
> ... Thoughts on this? Our CC0 paragraph currently looks like:
I think if you want to use CC BY-SA for the logo, you can do that
pretty easily by modifying your current non-software text to be
limited to "images (other than logos)" or something like that. I
don't think the text will be significantly more or less complicated
either way you decide, you should make your decision based on other
criteria.
--
Brett Smith