repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A+ 0


From: Aaron Wolf
Subject: Re: A+ 0
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:33:47 -0700

elsewhere in the criteria there is language about functionality
I think there's confusing with language of "impose"
Many websites function with requests blocked. For example, Google Analytics being blocked doesn't break anything. Given A+ level, I think it could be appropriate to be critical of any third-party requests being made. My inclination is to have it be a lower grade requirement (A or B) to not have breakage of *functionality* when requests are blocked (contrast that not loading particular fonts or analytics etc doesn't break functionality)

On 2024-04-18 10:37, bill-auger wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 01:30:13 -0400 bill-auger wrote:
which deliberately makes the
website useless if third-party requests are blocked
that may not be exactly accurate though - i think that cloudflare deal is not a
third-party request, but a re-direct, which (i think) blockers would not block

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]