[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2)
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2) |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:38:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Good job, both of you. :)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 15:36:53 -0400, Zak Rogoff wrote:
> *This post was written by community members Andrew Ferguson, with FSF
^ s/members/member/
> GitHub has responded positively to requests from
> the free software community
Well...partially true. I still stand by numerous community members,
including myself and rms, fruitlessly trying to get them to consider
releasing their JS as free software, or allowing their site to work with
it disabled.
https://mikegerwitz.com/about/githubbub
So I think "responded positively" is a bit too strong; maybe "responded
to some requests" or something along those lines?
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), (continued)
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/12
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Andrew Ferguson, 2016/04/12
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/12
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Andrew Ferguson, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Mike Gerwitz, 2016/04/13
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/14
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/14
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Andrew Ferguson, 2016/04/14
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/15
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2),
Mike Gerwitz <=
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Andrew Ferguson, 2016/04/17
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Zak Rogoff, 2016/04/19
- Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2), Andrew Ferguson, 2016/04/13