Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Rough Draft of Announcement (Task 2)

[Zak Rogoff]

On 04/09/2016 06:31 PM, Andrew Ferguson wrote:
> OK, a few questions that have come to me as I've been editing / redrafting.
> 
> A while back Mike mentioned that
> 
>     the evaluators wanted to list the specific requirements for moving
>     to the next letter grade, but rms didn't want that level of detail,
>     which makes it more difficult for others to encourage hosts to meet
>     the criteria
>
> The current draft still contains the second-last paragraph which urges
> people to contact hosts and persuade them to meet the criteria. It also
> contains the following, which was written before I was made aware of the
> above from Mike:
> 
>     The specific sections of each service that prevent each service from
>     achieving the next grade, as well as aspects which alread y achieve
>     criteria in the next grade have been noted. This enables volunteers
>     and maintainers to identify when a repository has reached a level
>     qualifying it for the next grade.
> 
> Should either one of these sections be removed? Or has the views on this
> changed?

For now we'll leave the the specific things needed to reach the next
letter grade, they're just on the actual evaluations Web page, which is
going to go up separately from the page with the criteria.

> I was also wondering where about on the GNU / FSF website the completed
> evaluations will be uploaded. Currently the PR links to the original PR
> for the announcement of the critera, and (near the end of the document)
> the criteria itself. However, if the evaluations are not on that page,
> they'll be missed from the PR! There is a suitable section in the first
> paragraph which could link to the evaluations, but I'm not sure what to
> link it to (it may be easier for Zak to upload the evaluations and then
> link to them in the PR just before uploading it, if so I'll add in a
> placeholder link that can be changed before upload).

A placeholder link is the way to do it. Thanks!


-- 
Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature