|
From: | Robert Nichols |
Subject: | Re: [rdiff-backup-users] New System Chown Backup-Hard-drive for new user? |
Date: | Sat, 8 Oct 2016 13:48:31 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
On 10/08/2016 10:23 AM, Wayne Sallee wrote:
I created a new linux opperating system. While I used the same user name, the number is different, so I copied my stuff over to the new system, and chowned the files over. No problem there. But now I need to get back to doing the rdiff-backups to the external hard drive. Should I chown the external drive so that the files mach, then continue as usual? Or is it not that simple? :-) I'm trying to avoid a lengthy backup session on the new system, and avoid excessive backup files, and make easy retrieval should I need an older file.
The problem with that is that the ownership of the files in the mirror will no longer agree with the numeric ownership recorded in the rdiff-backup-data metadata files. That shouldn't be a big deal, since rdiff-backup will default to using the user name when setting the ownership on restored files. The big problem will be that every file with a changed ID will be seen as having changed the next time you do a backup. That is going to result in a very long backup session and the creation of a huge number of tiny zero-diff files. It would be a lot cleaner to chown (and chgrp) the files in the new Linux system and adjust the numeric IDs in /etc/passwd and /etc/group to match the old system. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |