rdiff-backup-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Easy Way to Find Lost Files ?


From: Andrew Ferguson
Subject: Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Easy Way to Find Lost Files ?
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:26:06 -0500


On Jan 17, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Andrew Ferguson wrote:

The reason it hasn't been implemented is that it would require either figuring out how much space is needed beforehand (which requires scanning the whole source repository in advance, something which rdiff-backup is currently not setup for; however implementing that functionality would allow various other requested features to be developed), or rdiff-backup would have to detect that out-of- disk-space event, reverse the current session, delete an increment, and start over (that, of course, hits a horrible case when the current backup wants to add a, say, 40GB file, and deleting each increment only frees a few MB or so).

Surely it's possible to delete an old increment without reversing the entire backup in progress? As I understand it, a backup creates a new increment, it doesn't touch any of the existing ones, therefore it should be perfectly safe to delete any increment except the one currently being created, while the backup is running. At worst, we'd have to restart the backup of the current file, if the out of space error left the binary diff
file hopelessly corrupted.


Oh, sure. I didn't mean to imply it wasn't possible, just that was how it would work if you implemented it naively or with a script.

You could implement it by having rdiff-backup suspend on out-of-disk, then start a new rdiff-backup with --delete-older-than, then wake the original process. Currently, the second rdiff-backup process would refuse to run (I think) due to the first one working on the repository. It would also detect a partial backup, and then try to reverse the partial backup.


Andrew




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]