Re: [PATCH v6 29/33] job.h: assertions in the callers of JobDriver funcion pointers

[Hanna Reitz]

On 21.01.22 18:05, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
> ---
>   job.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

Just curious, why did you remove the assertion in job_co_entry()? 
(Looking at it again, it might have been nicer to swap it with the 
assertion below it, so that `job != NULL` is asserted first, but other 
than that...)

(And since I’m already replying to this patch, might as well point out 
s/funcion/function/ in the subject)

Hanna