[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] pnv: add a physical mapping array describing MMIO
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] pnv: add a physical mapping array describing MMIO ranges in each chip |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2018 18:20:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
On 05/23/2018 04:04 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 14:37:30 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 05/18/2018 11:00 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 May 2018 15:18:14 +0200
>>> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Based on previous work done in skiboot, the physical mapping array
>>>> helps in calculating the MMIO ranges of each controller depending on
>>>> the chip id and the chip type. This is will be particularly useful for
>>>> the P9 models which use less the XSCOM bus and rely more on MMIOs.
>>>>
>>>> A link on the chip is now necessary to calculate MMIO BARs and
>>>> sizes. This is why such a link is introduced in the PSIHB model.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>> hw/ppc/pnv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>> hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c | 11 +++++++++-
>>>> hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c | 8 ++++----
>>>> include/hw/ppc/pnv.h | 58
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>>> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>>>> index 031488131629..330bf6f74810 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>>>> @@ -712,6 +712,16 @@ static uint32_t pnv_chip_core_pir_p9(PnvChip *chip,
>>>> uint32_t core_id)
>>>> */
>>>> #define POWER9_CORE_MASK (0xffffffffffffffull)
>>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * POWER8 MMIOs
>>>> + */
>>>> +static const PnvPhysMapEntry pnv_chip_power8_phys_map[] = {
>>>> + [PNV_MAP_XSCOM] = { 0x0003fc0000000000ull, 0x0000000800000000ull
>>>> },
>>>> + [PNV_MAP_ICP] = { 0x0003ffff80000000ull, 0x0000000000100000ull
>>>> },
>>>> + [PNV_MAP_PSIHB] = { 0x0003fffe80000000ull, 0x0000000000100000ull
>>>> },
>>>> + [PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP] = { 0x0003ffe000000000ull, 0x0000000100000000ull
>>>> },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>>> {
>>>> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>>> @@ -721,7 +731,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass
>>>> *klass, void *data)
>>>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x221ef04980000000ull; /* P8 Murano DD2.1 */
>>>> k->cores_mask = POWER8E_CORE_MASK;
>>>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>>>> - k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>>>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>>>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8E";
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -734,7 +744,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_class_init(ObjectClass
>>>> *klass, void *data)
>>>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220ea04980000000ull; /* P8 Venice DD2.0 */
>>>> k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>>>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>>>> - k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>>>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>>>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8";
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -747,10 +757,17 @@ static void
>>>> pnv_chip_power8nvl_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x120d304980000000ull; /* P8 Naples DD1.0 */
>>>> k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>>>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>>>> - k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>>>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>>>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8NVL";
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * POWER9 MMIOs
>>>> + */
>>>> +static const PnvPhysMapEntry pnv_chip_power9_phys_map[] = {
>>>> + [PNV_MAP_XSCOM] = { 0x000603fc00000000ull, 0x0000040000000000ull
>>>> },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>>> {
>>>> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>>> @@ -760,7 +777,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass
>>>> *klass, void *data)
>>>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220d104900008000ull; /* P9 Nimbus DD2.0 */
>>>> k->cores_mask = POWER9_CORE_MASK;
>>>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p9;
>>>> - k->xscom_base = 0x00603fc00000000ull;
>>>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power9_phys_map;
>>>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER9";
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -797,15 +814,14 @@ static void pnv_chip_core_sanitize(PnvChip *chip,
>>>> Error **errp)
>>>> static void pnv_chip_init(Object *obj)
>>>> {
>>>> PnvChip *chip = PNV_CHIP(obj);
>>>> - PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>>>> -
>>>> - chip->xscom_base = pcc->xscom_base;
>>>>
>>>> object_initialize(&chip->lpc, sizeof(chip->lpc), TYPE_PNV_LPC);
>>>> object_property_add_child(obj, "lpc", OBJECT(&chip->lpc), NULL);
>>>>
>>>> object_initialize(&chip->psi, sizeof(chip->psi), TYPE_PNV_PSI);
>>>> object_property_add_child(obj, "psi", OBJECT(&chip->psi), NULL);
>>>> + object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->psi), "chip", obj,
>>>> + &error_abort);
>>>> object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->psi), "xics",
>>>> OBJECT(qdev_get_machine()),
>>>> &error_abort);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -829,7 +845,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_icp_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error
>>>> **errp)
>>>> XICSFabric *xi = XICS_FABRIC(qdev_get_machine());
>>>>
>>>> name = g_strdup_printf("icp-%x", chip->chip_id);
>>>> - memory_region_init(&chip->icp_mmio, OBJECT(chip), name, PNV_ICP_SIZE);
>>>> + memory_region_init(&chip->icp_mmio, OBJECT(chip), name,
>>>> PNV_ICP_SIZE(chip));
>>>> sysbus_init_mmio(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(chip), &chip->icp_mmio);
>>>> g_free(name);
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>>>> index 5b969127c303..dd7707b971c9 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>>>> @@ -465,6 +465,15 @@ static void pnv_psi_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
>>>> **errp)
>>>> Object *obj;
>>>> Error *err = NULL;
>>>> unsigned int i;
>>>> + PnvChip *chip;
>>>> +
>>>> + obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "chip", &err);
>>>> + if (!obj) {
>>>> + error_setg(errp, "%s: required link 'chip' not found: %s",
>>>> + __func__, error_get_pretty(err));
>>>> + return;
>>>
>>> err was dynamically allocated and must be freed with error_free().
>>
>> ok. There are quite a few places not doing it right then.
>>
>
> Yeah, error_get_pretty users are the usual suspects here.
>
>>> This being said, the link is supposed to have been set in pnv_chip_init()
>>> already, so if we can't get it here, it's likely a bug in QEMU. I'd rather
>>> pass &error_abort.
>>
>> The followed pattern in pnv is most of the time :
>>
>> object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->bar), "foo", obj,
>> &error_abort);
>>
>> and in the realize function :
>>
>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>>
>> obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "foo", &local_err);
>> if (!obj) {
>> error_setg(errp, "%s: required link 'foo' not found: %s",
>> __func__, error_get_pretty(local_err));
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> but you propose that we should rather simply do :
>>
>> obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "foo", &error_abort);
>>
>> Correct ?
>>
>
> Yes, but this is questionable :)
>
> The realize function has an Error ** arg, ie, it is expected to propagate
> errors and let the caller decide... so it is a matter of taste here.
>
> Another option to using error_get_pretty() is to use error_propagate() and
> error_prepend(), as suggested in include/qapi/error.h .
>
> See commit a1a6bbde4f6a29368f8f605cea2e73630ec1bc7c for an example.
>
>>>> + }
>>>> + chip = PNV_CHIP(obj);
>>>>
>>>> obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "xics", &err);
>>>> if (!obj) {
>>>> @@ -497,7 +506,7 @@ static void pnv_psi_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
>>>> **errp)
>>>>
>>>> /* Initialize MMIO region */
>>>> memory_region_init_io(&psi->regs_mr, OBJECT(dev), &psi_mmio_ops, psi,
>>>> - "psihb", PNV_PSIHB_SIZE);
>>>> + "psihb", PNV_PSIHB_SIZE(chip));
>>>>
>>>> /* Default BAR for MMIO region */
>>>> pnv_psi_set_bar(psi, psi->bar | PSIHB_BAR_EN);
>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>>>> index 46fae41f32b0..20ffc233174c 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>>>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void xscom_complete(CPUState *cs, uint64_t
>>>> hmer_bits)
>>>>
>>>> static uint32_t pnv_xscom_pcba(PnvChip *chip, uint64_t addr)
>>>> {
>>>> - addr &= (PNV_XSCOM_SIZE - 1);
>>>> + addr &= (PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip) - 1);
>>>>
>>>> if (pnv_chip_is_power9(chip)) {
>>>> return addr >> 3;
>>>> @@ -179,10 +179,10 @@ void pnv_xscom_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp)
>>>>
>>>> name = g_strdup_printf("xscom-%x", chip->chip_id);
>>>> memory_region_init_io(&chip->xscom_mmio, OBJECT(chip), &pnv_xscom_ops,
>>>> - chip, name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE);
>>>> + chip, name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip));
>>>> sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &chip->xscom_mmio);
>>>>
>>>> - memory_region_init(&chip->xscom, OBJECT(chip), name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE);
>>>> + memory_region_init(&chip->xscom, OBJECT(chip), name,
>>>> PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip));
>>>> address_space_init(&chip->xscom_as, &chip->xscom, name);
>>>> g_free(name);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static const char compat_p9[] =
>>>> "ibm,power9-xscom\0ibm,xscom";
>>>> int pnv_dt_xscom(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, int root_offset)
>>>> {
>>>> uint64_t reg[] = { cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip)),
>>>> - cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_SIZE) };
>>>> + cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip)) };
>>>> int xscom_offset;
>>>> ForeachPopulateArgs args;
>>>> char *name;
>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>>>> index 90759240a7b1..b810e7b84ec0 100644
>>>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>>>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>>>> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
>>>> uint64_t cores_mask;
>>>> void *cores;
>>>>
>>>> - hwaddr xscom_base;
>>>> MemoryRegion xscom_mmio;
>>>> MemoryRegion xscom;
>>>> AddressSpace xscom_as;
>>>> @@ -64,6 +63,19 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
>>>> PnvOCC occ;
>>>> } PnvChip;
>>>>
>>>> +typedef enum PnvPhysMapType {
>>>> + PNV_MAP_XSCOM,
>>>> + PNV_MAP_ICP,
>>>> + PNV_MAP_PSIHB,
>>>> + PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP,
>>>> + PNV_MAP_MAX,
>>>> +} PnvPhysMapType;
>>>> +
>>>> +typedef struct PnvPhysMapEntry {
>>>> + uint64_t base;
>>>> + uint64_t size;
>>>> +} PnvPhysMapEntry;
>>>> +
>>>> typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>>>> /*< private >*/
>>>> SysBusDeviceClass parent_class;
>>>> @@ -73,7 +85,7 @@ typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>>>> uint64_t chip_cfam_id;
>>>> uint64_t cores_mask;
>>>>
>>>> - hwaddr xscom_base;
>>>> + const PnvPhysMapEntry *phys_map;
>>>>
>>>> uint32_t (*core_pir)(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id);
>>>> } PnvChipClass;
>>>> @@ -159,9 +171,28 @@ void pnv_bmc_powerdown(IPMIBmc *bmc);
>>>> /*
>>>> * POWER8 MMIO base addresses
>>>> */
>>>> -#define PNV_XSCOM_SIZE 0x800000000ull
>>>> -#define PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip) \
>>>> - (chip->xscom_base + ((uint64_t)(chip)->chip_id) * PNV_XSCOM_SIZE)
>>>> +static inline uint64_t pnv_map_size(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType
>>>> type)
>>>> +{
>>>> + PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>>>> + const PnvPhysMapEntry *map = &pcc->phys_map[type];
>>>> +
>>>> + return map->size;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline uint64_t pnv_map_base(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType
>>>> type)
>>>> +{
>>>> + PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>>>> + const PnvPhysMapEntry *map = &pcc->phys_map[type];
>>>> +
>>>> + if (pnv_chip_is_power9(chip)) {
>>>> + return map->base + ((uint64_t) chip->chip_id << 42);
>>>
>>> So this patch also changes the way the base address is computed
>>> with POWER9. Shouldn't this go to a separate patch or at least
>>> mention the functional change in the changelog ?
>>
>> P9 is not really supported, multi P9 chips even less. But yes, I can
>> mention that the P9 MMIO base address is being fixed.
>>
>>> Also, shouldn't this be a PnvChipClass level function rather than
>>> doing a runtime check ?
>>
>> Hmm. pnv_map_base() needs the 'chip_id' to calculate the base
>> address which is not a class level attribute. The P9 check only
>> needs the chip class but it is more convenient to use a PnvChip.
>> Only class_init routines use class variables.
>
> Not sure to understand... My suggestion was just to add a new function
> attribute to PnvChipClass:
>
> uint64_t (*map_base)(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType type);
>
> And have two separate implementations for P8 and P9:
>
> static uint64_t pnv_chip_map_base_p8(const PnvChip *chip,
> const PnvPhysMapEntry *map)
> {
> return map->base + chip->chip_id * map->size;
> }
>
> static uint64_t pnv_chip_map_base_p9(const PnvChip *chip,
> const PnvPhysMapEntry *map)
> {
> return map->base + ((uint64_t) chip->chip_id << 42);
> }
>
> And pnv_map_base() would be:
>
> static inline uint64_t pnv_map_base(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType type)
> {
> PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>
> return pcc->map_base(chip, &pcc->phys_map[type]);
> }
ok. yes, that's a nice proposition.
Thanks,
C.
>
>>> The rest of the patch looks good.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> C.
>>
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + return map->base + chip->chip_id * map->size;
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +#define PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_XSCOM)
>>>> +#define PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_XSCOM)
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * XSCOM 0x20109CA defines the ICP BAR:
>>>> @@ -177,18 +208,13 @@ void pnv_bmc_powerdown(IPMIBmc *bmc);
>>>> * 0xffffe02200000000 -> 0x0003ffff80800000
>>>> * 0xffffe02600000000 -> 0x0003ffff80900000
>>>> */
>>>> -#define PNV_ICP_SIZE 0x0000000000100000ull
>>>> -#define PNV_ICP_BASE(chip) \
>>>> - (0x0003ffff80000000ull + (uint64_t) PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) *
>>>> PNV_ICP_SIZE)
>>>> -
>>>> +#define PNV_ICP_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_ICP)
>>>> +#define PNV_ICP_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_ICP)
>>>>
>>>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_SIZE 0x0000000000100000ull
>>>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_BASE(chip) \
>>>> - (0x0003fffe80000000ull + (uint64_t)PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) *
>>>> PNV_PSIHB_SIZE)
>>>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB)
>>>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB)
>>>>
>>>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE 0x0000000100000000ull
>>>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_BASE(chip) \
>>>> - (0x0003ffe000000000ull + (uint64_t)PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) * \
>>>> - PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE)
>>>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP)
>>>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP)
>>>>
>>>> #endif /* _PPC_PNV_H */
>>>
>>
>