[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] pnv: add a physical mapping array describing MMIO
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] pnv: add a physical mapping array describing MMIO ranges in each chip |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2018 14:37:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
On 05/18/2018 11:00 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018 15:18:14 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Based on previous work done in skiboot, the physical mapping array
>> helps in calculating the MMIO ranges of each controller depending on
>> the chip id and the chip type. This is will be particularly useful for
>> the P9 models which use less the XSCOM bus and rely more on MMIOs.
>>
>> A link on the chip is now necessary to calculate MMIO BARs and
>> sizes. This is why such a link is introduced in the PSIHB model.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/pnv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c | 11 +++++++++-
>> hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c | 8 ++++----
>> include/hw/ppc/pnv.h | 58
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> index 031488131629..330bf6f74810 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> @@ -712,6 +712,16 @@ static uint32_t pnv_chip_core_pir_p9(PnvChip *chip,
>> uint32_t core_id)
>> */
>> #define POWER9_CORE_MASK (0xffffffffffffffull)
>>
>> +/*
>> + * POWER8 MMIOs
>> + */
>> +static const PnvPhysMapEntry pnv_chip_power8_phys_map[] = {
>> + [PNV_MAP_XSCOM] = { 0x0003fc0000000000ull, 0x0000000800000000ull },
>> + [PNV_MAP_ICP] = { 0x0003ffff80000000ull, 0x0000000000100000ull },
>> + [PNV_MAP_PSIHB] = { 0x0003fffe80000000ull, 0x0000000000100000ull },
>> + [PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP] = { 0x0003ffe000000000ull, 0x0000000100000000ull },
>> +};
>> +
>> static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> {
>> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>> @@ -721,7 +731,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass
>> *klass, void *data)
>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x221ef04980000000ull; /* P8 Murano DD2.1 */
>> k->cores_mask = POWER8E_CORE_MASK;
>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>> - k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8E";
>> }
>>
>> @@ -734,7 +744,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_class_init(ObjectClass
>> *klass, void *data)
>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220ea04980000000ull; /* P8 Venice DD2.0 */
>> k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>> - k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8";
>> }
>>
>> @@ -747,10 +757,17 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8nvl_class_init(ObjectClass
>> *klass, void *data)
>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x120d304980000000ull; /* P8 Naples DD1.0 */
>> k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>> - k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8NVL";
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * POWER9 MMIOs
>> + */
>> +static const PnvPhysMapEntry pnv_chip_power9_phys_map[] = {
>> + [PNV_MAP_XSCOM] = { 0x000603fc00000000ull, 0x0000040000000000ull },
>> +};
>> +
>> static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> {
>> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>> @@ -760,7 +777,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass
>> *klass, void *data)
>> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220d104900008000ull; /* P9 Nimbus DD2.0 */
>> k->cores_mask = POWER9_CORE_MASK;
>> k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p9;
>> - k->xscom_base = 0x00603fc00000000ull;
>> + k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power9_phys_map;
>> dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER9";
>> }
>>
>> @@ -797,15 +814,14 @@ static void pnv_chip_core_sanitize(PnvChip *chip,
>> Error **errp)
>> static void pnv_chip_init(Object *obj)
>> {
>> PnvChip *chip = PNV_CHIP(obj);
>> - PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>> -
>> - chip->xscom_base = pcc->xscom_base;
>>
>> object_initialize(&chip->lpc, sizeof(chip->lpc), TYPE_PNV_LPC);
>> object_property_add_child(obj, "lpc", OBJECT(&chip->lpc), NULL);
>>
>> object_initialize(&chip->psi, sizeof(chip->psi), TYPE_PNV_PSI);
>> object_property_add_child(obj, "psi", OBJECT(&chip->psi), NULL);
>> + object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->psi), "chip", obj,
>> + &error_abort);
>> object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->psi), "xics",
>> OBJECT(qdev_get_machine()),
>> &error_abort);
>>
>> @@ -829,7 +845,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_icp_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error
>> **errp)
>> XICSFabric *xi = XICS_FABRIC(qdev_get_machine());
>>
>> name = g_strdup_printf("icp-%x", chip->chip_id);
>> - memory_region_init(&chip->icp_mmio, OBJECT(chip), name, PNV_ICP_SIZE);
>> + memory_region_init(&chip->icp_mmio, OBJECT(chip), name,
>> PNV_ICP_SIZE(chip));
>> sysbus_init_mmio(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(chip), &chip->icp_mmio);
>> g_free(name);
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>> index 5b969127c303..dd7707b971c9 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>> @@ -465,6 +465,15 @@ static void pnv_psi_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
>> **errp)
>> Object *obj;
>> Error *err = NULL;
>> unsigned int i;
>> + PnvChip *chip;
>> +
>> + obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "chip", &err);
>> + if (!obj) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "%s: required link 'chip' not found: %s",
>> + __func__, error_get_pretty(err));
>> + return;
>
> err was dynamically allocated and must be freed with error_free().
ok. There are quite a few places not doing it right then.
> This being said, the link is supposed to have been set in pnv_chip_init()
> already, so if we can't get it here, it's likely a bug in QEMU. I'd rather
> pass &error_abort.
The followed pattern in pnv is most of the time :
object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->bar), "foo", obj,
&error_abort);
and in the realize function :
Error *local_err = NULL;
obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "foo", &local_err);
if (!obj) {
error_setg(errp, "%s: required link 'foo' not found: %s",
__func__, error_get_pretty(local_err));
return;
}
but you propose that we should rather simply do :
obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "foo", &error_abort);
Correct ?
>> + }
>> + chip = PNV_CHIP(obj);
>>
>> obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "xics", &err);
>> if (!obj) {
>> @@ -497,7 +506,7 @@ static void pnv_psi_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
>> **errp)
>>
>> /* Initialize MMIO region */
>> memory_region_init_io(&psi->regs_mr, OBJECT(dev), &psi_mmio_ops, psi,
>> - "psihb", PNV_PSIHB_SIZE);
>> + "psihb", PNV_PSIHB_SIZE(chip));
>>
>> /* Default BAR for MMIO region */
>> pnv_psi_set_bar(psi, psi->bar | PSIHB_BAR_EN);
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> index 46fae41f32b0..20ffc233174c 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void xscom_complete(CPUState *cs, uint64_t
>> hmer_bits)
>>
>> static uint32_t pnv_xscom_pcba(PnvChip *chip, uint64_t addr)
>> {
>> - addr &= (PNV_XSCOM_SIZE - 1);
>> + addr &= (PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip) - 1);
>>
>> if (pnv_chip_is_power9(chip)) {
>> return addr >> 3;
>> @@ -179,10 +179,10 @@ void pnv_xscom_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp)
>>
>> name = g_strdup_printf("xscom-%x", chip->chip_id);
>> memory_region_init_io(&chip->xscom_mmio, OBJECT(chip), &pnv_xscom_ops,
>> - chip, name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE);
>> + chip, name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip));
>> sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &chip->xscom_mmio);
>>
>> - memory_region_init(&chip->xscom, OBJECT(chip), name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE);
>> + memory_region_init(&chip->xscom, OBJECT(chip), name,
>> PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip));
>> address_space_init(&chip->xscom_as, &chip->xscom, name);
>> g_free(name);
>> }
>> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static const char compat_p9[] =
>> "ibm,power9-xscom\0ibm,xscom";
>> int pnv_dt_xscom(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, int root_offset)
>> {
>> uint64_t reg[] = { cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip)),
>> - cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_SIZE) };
>> + cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip)) };
>> int xscom_offset;
>> ForeachPopulateArgs args;
>> char *name;
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> index 90759240a7b1..b810e7b84ec0 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
>> uint64_t cores_mask;
>> void *cores;
>>
>> - hwaddr xscom_base;
>> MemoryRegion xscom_mmio;
>> MemoryRegion xscom;
>> AddressSpace xscom_as;
>> @@ -64,6 +63,19 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
>> PnvOCC occ;
>> } PnvChip;
>>
>> +typedef enum PnvPhysMapType {
>> + PNV_MAP_XSCOM,
>> + PNV_MAP_ICP,
>> + PNV_MAP_PSIHB,
>> + PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP,
>> + PNV_MAP_MAX,
>> +} PnvPhysMapType;
>> +
>> +typedef struct PnvPhysMapEntry {
>> + uint64_t base;
>> + uint64_t size;
>> +} PnvPhysMapEntry;
>> +
>> typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>> /*< private >*/
>> SysBusDeviceClass parent_class;
>> @@ -73,7 +85,7 @@ typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>> uint64_t chip_cfam_id;
>> uint64_t cores_mask;
>>
>> - hwaddr xscom_base;
>> + const PnvPhysMapEntry *phys_map;
>>
>> uint32_t (*core_pir)(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id);
>> } PnvChipClass;
>> @@ -159,9 +171,28 @@ void pnv_bmc_powerdown(IPMIBmc *bmc);
>> /*
>> * POWER8 MMIO base addresses
>> */
>> -#define PNV_XSCOM_SIZE 0x800000000ull
>> -#define PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip) \
>> - (chip->xscom_base + ((uint64_t)(chip)->chip_id) * PNV_XSCOM_SIZE)
>> +static inline uint64_t pnv_map_size(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType
>> type)
>> +{
>> + PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>> + const PnvPhysMapEntry *map = &pcc->phys_map[type];
>> +
>> + return map->size;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline uint64_t pnv_map_base(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType
>> type)
>> +{
>> + PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>> + const PnvPhysMapEntry *map = &pcc->phys_map[type];
>> +
>> + if (pnv_chip_is_power9(chip)) {
>> + return map->base + ((uint64_t) chip->chip_id << 42);
>
> So this patch also changes the way the base address is computed
> with POWER9. Shouldn't this go to a separate patch or at least
> mention the functional change in the changelog ?
P9 is not really supported, multi P9 chips even less. But yes, I can
mention that the P9 MMIO base address is being fixed.
> Also, shouldn't this be a PnvChipClass level function rather than
> doing a runtime check ?
Hmm. pnv_map_base() needs the 'chip_id' to calculate the base
address which is not a class level attribute. The P9 check only
needs the chip class but it is more convenient to use a PnvChip.
Only class_init routines use class variables.
> The rest of the patch looks good.
Thanks,
C.
>> + } else {
>> + return map->base + chip->chip_id * map->size;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_XSCOM)
>> +#define PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_XSCOM)
>>
>> /*
>> * XSCOM 0x20109CA defines the ICP BAR:
>> @@ -177,18 +208,13 @@ void pnv_bmc_powerdown(IPMIBmc *bmc);
>> * 0xffffe02200000000 -> 0x0003ffff80800000
>> * 0xffffe02600000000 -> 0x0003ffff80900000
>> */
>> -#define PNV_ICP_SIZE 0x0000000000100000ull
>> -#define PNV_ICP_BASE(chip) \
>> - (0x0003ffff80000000ull + (uint64_t) PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) * PNV_ICP_SIZE)
>> -
>> +#define PNV_ICP_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_ICP)
>> +#define PNV_ICP_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_ICP)
>>
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_SIZE 0x0000000000100000ull
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_BASE(chip) \
>> - (0x0003fffe80000000ull + (uint64_t)PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) *
>> PNV_PSIHB_SIZE)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB)
>>
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE 0x0000000100000000ull
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_BASE(chip) \
>> - (0x0003ffe000000000ull + (uint64_t)PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) * \
>> - PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE(chip) pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_BASE(chip) pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP)
>>
>> #endif /* _PPC_PNV_H */
>