qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 07/22] target/i386: reimplement check for validity of LOCK pr


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/22] target/i386: reimplement check for validity of LOCK prefix
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 08:55:29 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 12/23/23 05:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The previous check erroneously allowed CMP to be modified with LOCK.
Instead, tag explicitly the instructions that do support LOCK.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
  target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc | 17 ++++++++++-------
  target/i386/tcg/decode-new.h     |  3 +++
  target/i386/tcg/emit.c.inc       |  5 -----
  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

It's hard to see how this fits together, because there don't seem to be any uses of X86_SPECIAL_{Locked,HasLock} yet.

But the illegal test in disas_insn_new looks more plausibly correct than the one in decode_modrm, so

Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>


r~


diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc b/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc
index 232c6a45c96..5eb2e9d0224 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@
#define cpuid(feat) .cpuid = X86_FEAT_##feat,
  #define xchg .special = X86_SPECIAL_Locked,
+#define lock .special = X86_SPECIAL_HasLock,
  #define mmx .special = X86_SPECIAL_MMX,
  #define zext0 .special = X86_SPECIAL_ZExtOp0,
  #define zext2 .special = X86_SPECIAL_ZExtOp2,
@@ -1103,10 +1104,6 @@ static int decode_modrm(DisasContext *s, CPUX86State 
*env, X86DecodedInsn *decod
  {
      int modrm = get_modrm(s, env);
      if ((modrm >> 6) == 3) {
-        if (s->prefix & PREFIX_LOCK) {
-            decode->e.gen = gen_illegal;
-            return 0xff;
-        }
          op->n = (modrm & 7);
          if (type != X86_TYPE_Q && type != X86_TYPE_N) {
              op->n |= REX_B(s);
@@ -1881,6 +1878,9 @@ static void disas_insn_new(DisasContext *s, CPUState 
*cpu, int b)
          if (decode.op[0].has_ea) {
              s->prefix |= PREFIX_LOCK;
          }
+        decode.e.special = X86_SPECIAL_HasLock;
+        /* fallthrough */
+    case X86_SPECIAL_HasLock:
          break;
case X86_SPECIAL_ZExtOp0:
@@ -1909,6 +1909,12 @@ static void disas_insn_new(DisasContext *s, CPUState 
*cpu, int b)
          break;
      }
+ if (s->prefix & PREFIX_LOCK) {
+        if (decode.e.special != X86_SPECIAL_HasLock || !decode.op[0].has_ea) {
+            goto illegal_op;
+        }
+    }
+
      if (!validate_vex(s, &decode)) {
          return;
      }
@@ -1952,9 +1958,6 @@ static void disas_insn_new(DisasContext *s, CPUState 
*cpu, int b)
          gen_load_ea(s, &decode.mem, decode.e.vex_class == 12);
      }
      if (s->prefix & PREFIX_LOCK) {
-        if (decode.op[0].unit != X86_OP_INT || !decode.op[0].has_ea) {
-            goto illegal_op;
-        }
          gen_load(s, &decode, 2, s->T1);
          decode.e.gen(s, env, &decode);
      } else {
diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.h b/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.h
index e6c904a3192..611bfddd957 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.h
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.h
@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ typedef enum X86InsnCheck {
  typedef enum X86InsnSpecial {
      X86_SPECIAL_None,
+ /* Accepts LOCK prefix; LOCKed operations do not load or writeback operand 0 */
+    X86_SPECIAL_HasLock,
+
      /* Always locked if it has a memory operand (XCHG) */
      X86_SPECIAL_Locked,
diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/emit.c.inc b/target/i386/tcg/emit.c.inc
index d444d83e534..98c4c9569ef 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/emit.c.inc
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/emit.c.inc
@@ -55,11 +55,6 @@ static void gen_NM_exception(DisasContext *s)
      gen_exception(s, EXCP07_PREX);
  }
-static void gen_illegal(DisasContext *s, CPUX86State *env, X86DecodedInsn *decode)
-{
-    gen_illegal_opcode(s);
-}
-
  static void gen_load_ea(DisasContext *s, AddressParts *mem, bool is_vsib)
  {
      TCGv ea = gen_lea_modrm_1(s, *mem, is_vsib);




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]