qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:50:17 +0200

On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 17:41:56 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:34:05 +0200
> 
> Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 17:11:05 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > fs_version() is a top level test function. Factor out the sugar
> > > to a separate helper instead of hijacking it in other tests.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c |   14 +++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > index c15908f27b3d..63f91aaf77e6 100644
> > > --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > @@ -567,10 +567,8 @@ static void v9fs_rflush(P9Req *req)
> > > 
> > >      v9fs_req_free(req);
> > >  
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > -static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
> > > +static void do_fs_version(QVirtio9P *v9p)
> > > 
> > >  {
> > > 
> > > -    QVirtio9P *v9p = obj;
> > > -    alloc = t_alloc;
> > > 
> > >      const char *version = "9P2000.L";
> > >      uint16_t server_len;
> > >      char *server_version;
> > > 
> > > @@ -585,13 +583,19 @@ static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data,
> > > QGuestAllocator *t_alloc) g_free(server_version);
> > > 
> > >  }
> > 
> > So the naming convention from now on shall be do_fs_*() for non-toplevel
> > functions there. Not that I care too much about the precise prefix, but
> > how
> > about just do_*() for them instead?
> 
> I've prepended "do_" to the existing names by pure laziness but I'm
> fine with any prefix or naming convention actually.
> 
> So just tell me what you prefer and I'll send a v2.

It's really just more pleasant for the eye to have the prefix a bit shorter. 
So use do_*() or any other kind of xx_*() or xxx_*() prefix that comes to your 
mind. It will be fine with me.

Thanks Greg!

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]