[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper
From: |
Christian Schoenebeck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:34:05 +0200 |
On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 17:11:05 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> fs_version() is a top level test function. Factor out the sugar
> to a separate helper instead of hijacking it in other tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> ---
> tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> index c15908f27b3d..63f91aaf77e6 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> @@ -567,10 +567,8 @@ static void v9fs_rflush(P9Req *req)
> v9fs_req_free(req);
> }
>
> -static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
> +static void do_fs_version(QVirtio9P *v9p)
> {
> - QVirtio9P *v9p = obj;
> - alloc = t_alloc;
> const char *version = "9P2000.L";
> uint16_t server_len;
> char *server_version;
> @@ -585,13 +583,19 @@ static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data,
> QGuestAllocator *t_alloc) g_free(server_version);
> }
So the naming convention from now on shall be do_fs_*() for non-toplevel
functions there. Not that I care too much about the precise prefix, but how
about just do_*() for them instead?
Except of that, your patches look fine to me.
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
- [PATCH 0/5] tests/9pfs: Code refactoring, Greg Kurz, 2020/10/20
- [PATCH 2/5] tests/9pfs: Turn fs_readdir_split() into a helper, Greg Kurz, 2020/10/20
- [PATCH 3/5] tests/9pfs: Set alloc in fs_create_dir(), Greg Kurz, 2020/10/20
- [PATCH 4/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_attach() helper, Greg Kurz, 2020/10/20
- [PATCH 5/5] tests/9pfs: Turn fs_mkdir() into a helper, Greg Kurz, 2020/10/20