Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] hw/arm/raspi: Run U-Boot on the raspi machines

[Peter Maydell]

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 06:53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> (Cc'ed Wainer from the Python part).
>
> On 1/21/20 12:51 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Following Laurent report:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg639950.html
> >
> > The SYS_timer is already merged, see:
> > https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=d05be883fc
> > "hw/timer/bcm2835: Add the BCM2835 SYS_timer"
> >
> > The first patch should fix Laurent other issue.
> > Then few python patches are require to break into U-Boot console,
> > and the last patches add U-Boot tests for Raspi2 and Raspi3.
> >
> > Laurent, if you successfully test U-Boot with this patchset again,
> > do you mind replying with a "Tested-by:" tag?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Phil.
> >
> > Since v3:
> > - rewrote '-smp' fix.
> > - tests use Debian 'trustable' u-boot.elf
> >
> > previous feedbacks from Peter on v3:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg655415.html
> >
> > v3: https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg653807.html
> > Supersedes: <address@hidden>
> >
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (7):
> >    hw/arm/raspi: Remove obsolete use of -smp to set the soc 'enabled-cpus'
>
> While the first patch is reviewed by Alistair, the rest (acceptance
> tests) still requires an eye from Cleber/Eduardo.
>
> Can you queue the first patch via your qemu-arm tree?

OK, I've queued patch 1 (and dropped the rest from my
to-review queue on the assumption that somebody else will
pick them up and/or you'll send a respin at some point).

-- PMM