|
From: | Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 5/6] aspeed/smc: Let the SSI core layer define the bus name |
Date: | Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:36:30 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 |
On 3/7/22 11:25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/3/22 08:18, Cédric Le Goater wrote:If no id is provided, qdev automatically assigns a unique ename with"an unique name"?the following pattern "<type>.<index>".Maybe complete with smth like: "which avoid bus name collision when using multiple buses."
sure. will do. The goal behind this patch is to start experimenting with user created "m25p80" devices such :-drive file=<file>,format=raw,id=drive0 -device mx66l1g45g,bus=ssi.0,drive=drive0
BMC machines are starting to duplicate and I think, at least for Aspeed, that we should offer a bare machine per SoC and let the user define the I2C topology on the command line. The other aspect to cover is the definition of the flash devices (possibly 3 controllers * 2-3 CS). Adding a cs= or and addr= is the next step. Thanks, C.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |