[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JSON Representation
From: |
Konstantinos Chasialis |
Subject: |
Re: JSON Representation |
Date: |
Sat, 9 May 2020 18:43:24 +0300 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [email.uoa.gr] |
> Oh I see. Doesn't that mean that we ought to tag the values (every
> value) with a "type" property?
>
> An unsigned int value would then be:
>
> {"type" : "UnsignedInt", "value" : 15, "size" : 1}
>
> And a signed value:
>
> {"type" : "Int", "value" : 15, "size" : 12}
>
Will do it.
> This is basically the "type" I am proposing above right?
>
Yes.
- Re: JSON Representation, (continued)
- Re: JSON Representation, Jose E. Marchesi, 2020/05/05
- Re: JSON Representation, Egeyar Bagcioglu, 2020/05/05
- Re: JSON Representation, Konstantinos Chasialis, 2020/05/06
- Re: JSON Representation, Jose E. Marchesi, 2020/05/06
- Re: JSON Representation, Konstantinos Chasialis, 2020/05/06
- Re: JSON Representation, Jose E. Marchesi, 2020/05/06
- Re: JSON Representation, Konstantinos Chasialis, 2020/05/07
- Re: JSON Representation, Jose E. Marchesi, 2020/05/07
- Re: JSON Representation, Konstantinos Chasialis, 2020/05/09
- Re: JSON Representation, Jose E. Marchesi, 2020/05/09
- Re: JSON Representation,
Konstantinos Chasialis <=
- Re: JSON Representation, Jose E. Marchesi, 2020/05/09
- Re: JSON Representation, Konstantinos Chasialis, 2020/05/10