[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Partysip-dev] crash-patch and better network diagnostics
From: |
Fredrik Thulin |
Subject: |
Re: [Partysip-dev] crash-patch and better network diagnostics |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:22:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 16.35, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Fredrik Thulin wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > attached two patches fixes some things i found when working with
> > partysip on a train (meaning no network) :
> >
> > * fredrik-partysip-crash-unresolvable-host2:
> > a bit hard to read diff - the important line is the added
>
> did you indent the files? the .indent.pro files are now in the
> osip and partysip directories.
yes - i noticed. very good. i beleive i did - didn't it look indented? i tried
to but maybe i sent you the wrong version. [checked] no, it was the indented
one i sent.
> you mean without calling somebody without any host? Does linphone can send
> such urls?
yes - and somehow partysip thought it was a host and tried to send() to '9999'
(meaning 'host' as ouputted with my
fredrik-partysip-better-network-diagnostics-patch2 applied was '9999').
> Anyway, I'll verify if I also have some crashes with linphone.
sure, please do. but doesn't the logic of the patch seem sound? something like
20 lines up in the code the same loop is performed, but only after checking
the pointer isn't NULL.
> > (btw. the thing i was working on on the train is an ENUM plugin (rfc2916)
> > for partysip. do you consider that interesting? here in sweden we will
> > probably accomplish a delegation of 6.4.e164.arpa soon, and i want to use
> > partysip in our (Stockholm university's) tests)
>
> That's very interesting. Keep me informed of your progress.
i'm planning on finishing a version without dialplans (meaning where a ENUM
lookup is performed if you dial the whole number - eventually you want to say
stuff like 'if a user enters a number between n and nn, append x and do enum
etc.) as soon as possible and send you that. the biggest problem i see yet is
that i have still not had time to read rfc3261 (soon, i promise) and don't
know what different UA's will do. i guess my Cisco 7960 will append
@sipserver-fqdn to the request, but linphone doesn't.
/Fredrik