paragui-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [paragui-users] another weekly update *g*


From: Asko Kauppi
Subject: Re: [paragui-users] another weekly update *g*
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:33 +0300


I wouldn't replace '//' comments since _all_ C compilers i've seen/used lately (even ancient ones) support them.


Teunis Peters kirjoittaa sunnuntaina, 31. elokuuta 2003, kello 23:49:

On 31 Aug 2003, Mark Junker wrote:

Well, I've almost completed the ParaGUI port to C.
Got a few more bugs and design flaws to squash (I made a few incorrect assumptions fairly early on *sigh*) and then I'll be ready to post it.

As of now it either opens a window and crashes or doesn't and crashes.

Under X it seems to be some kind of NULL pointer leaking in...
console?  Well, I have no SDL videosupport under console.  I'm still
trying to get this thing to exit without hanging on an error *wry grin*

Well more when I have more than a black screen.. . hopefully soon :)
Sounds good.

Well to update... *meep* *bangs forehead against wall out of stupidity*
Bunch of stupid assumptions.  Too many to count.
I'm down to class inheritance cleanup - once this is done I can post as
it'll probably work.

I really hope I can use it in our next project. The EC++ compiler by Hitachi/ Renesas (V5) was really brain dead :( and it was *really* expensive. The current V7 contains full support for templates/exceptions ... but it's too
expensive for such a small company.

Should work.  This is a complete rewrite in C.  I'm even removing (as I
find them) C++-style commenting (//) and replacing with /*..*/

The libstdc++ stuff has been replaced from bits combined from glib (trees, hashes, lists, memory :), pango (starting - international string layout)
and some of my own bits.  This thing will be able to do a few things
ParaGUI cannot currently do.  Such as easily write widget factories and
easily add more widgets without breaking anything *g*.  At least that's
the idea.

Unless your compiler doesn't allow #define macros or indirect function
calls (void (f)(void);  struct->f())  this should run fine.

It's NOT clean looking. Or particularily easy to read sometimes. But it's
nice and powerful *grin*

G'day, eh? :)
        - Teunis



_______________________________________________
paragui-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paragui-users






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]