On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Atani wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2003 01:49 pm, Teunis Peters wrote:
It's NOT clean looking. Or particularily easy to read sometimes.
But it's
nice and powerful *grin*
Perhaps put it on a less restrictive license even? Something that
can be used
in a closed source application... ie: statically linked with
application
without (L)GPL restrictions. An example of a nice license for this
could be
BSD (revised), zlib/libpng, MIT, etc.
I'll check the glib license for their bits but the rest should be okay
:)
hrm. I'm fine with any of them - I just want credits still present
(which
I'm working on maintaining :)
What do the rest of y'all think?
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis
_______________________________________________
paragui-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paragui-users