Re: [paragui-users] another weekly update *g*

[Atani]

On Sunday 31 August 2003 03:33 pm, Teunis Peters wrote:
> > Perhaps put it on a less restrictive license even?  Something that can be
> > used in a closed source application... ie: statically linked with
> > application without (L)GPL restrictions.  An example of a nice license
> > for this could be BSD (revised), zlib/libpng, MIT, etc.
>
> I'll check the glib license for their bits but the rest should be okay :)
> hrm.  I'm fine with any of them - I just want credits still present (which
> I'm working on maintaining :)
>
> What do the rest of y'all think?

I am actually fine with any license that allows an easier integration in a 
closed source environment.  While it does not really matter either way for me 
I think it might be worthwhile to have the options available for those 
working in say an embeded environment perhaps?

Mike