[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [paragui-users] widget registry?
From: |
Teunis Peters |
Subject: |
Re: [paragui-users] widget registry? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT) |
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Atani wrote:
> On Thursday 14 August 2003 12:54 pm, Teunis Peters wrote:
> > wouldn't... skip lists are tempting but so are btrees.
>
> I didnt even think about using a skip list...
>
> >
> > All in all it's a lot trickier than saying
> > std::map<std::string,object*>
>
> What about other libraries that provide these? Perhaps the Apache runtime
> libs?
not sufficient. besides not that serious. and if gnome dependencies
(gtk) are bad, I'd guess apache are worse. I also run two different
versions of apache on my two machines... or maybe 3 if I ever run windows
2000 again :)
> >
> > I'm starting to suspect that when I'm done, the C version will be a lot
> > uglier than the current but it will also be faster...
>
> The ultimate tradeoff... speed vs clean code...
you got it.
Actually my prob right now is with widget registries. Data organization's
not really that difficult - I'm just really rusty.
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis
- [paragui-users] widget registry?, Teunis Peters, 2003/08/13
- Re: [paragui-users] widget registry?, Roger D. Vargas, 2003/08/14
- Re: [paragui-users] widget registry?, Asko Kauppi, 2003/08/14
- Re: [paragui-users] widget registry?, Teunis Peters, 2003/08/14
- Re: [paragui-users] widget registry?, Asko Kauppi, 2003/08/15
- Re: [paragui-users] widget registry?, Teunis Peters, 2003/08/15
- Re: [paragui-users] widget registry?, Mark Junker, 2003/08/14