[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny
From: |
Andrew S |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:56:30 +0400 |
Dear Christophe!
02.09.10, 20:12, "Christophe De Wagter" <address@hidden>:
>
> The quality of the IMU DOES matter. Lower drift, better resolution, high
> dynamic range make a difference.
>
For my expirience drift and resolution affects only ability to keep angles for
long time without correction. Dynamic range 300 deg/sec is quite enough, but
accelerometers must have good dynamic range for vibration tolerancy of your imu.
Andrew
- [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Germar Walter, 2010/09/01
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, David Carlson, 2010/09/01
- RE: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, mark.griffin, 2010/09/01
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, David Conger, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Christophe De Wagter, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, David Conger, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Christophe De Wagter, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, David, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny,
Andrew S <=
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, David Conger, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Marc Schwarzbach, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Christophe De Wagter, 2010/09/03
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, David Conger, 2010/09/03
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, David Conger, 2010/09/04
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Rui Costa, 2010/09/02
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny, Christophe De Wagter, 2010/09/02