Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny

[Marc Schwarzbach]

Hi David,

there are different approaches of intgating an IMU to the paparazi system.
One is to use an external processor doing the drift compensation, Kalman etc. 
This would be an external AHRS as used by OSAM with the MTi-G or others with 
the Vectornav or CHR-6dm.
These are in most cases more expensive (then the autopilot itself).
The data can be dirctly used as the estimator.

The other approach (as done by Hochschule Bremen/Warmers) is to use the raw 
data of gyros and accelerometers (like from the Sparkfun 6DOF Razor, this board 
only provides analogue values, no controller onboad) and process it in the 
paparazzi board using the DCM calculations by Premerlani and Bizard (same as 
UAV-Devboard or ArduIMU). The estimator calculation normally performed for the 
IR sensors are rewritten for that.

Hope this helps to understand the diefferent aproaches.

Cheers

Marc



-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
> Von: David Conger <address@hidden>
> An: address@hidden
> Betreff: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny

> Hello, Thank you, this is all good information.
> 
> I understand the issue with using the IMU is not documentation related. I
> am trying which is why I am asking so many questions today. I hope everyone
> doesn't mind my questions while I try different things. As always I will
> add what I learn to the Wiki where I see a void.
> 
> Am I correct then in staying that those Paparazzi Fixed Wing projects
> flying with IMU are relying on the AHRS on the IMU and feeding estimator with
> the results? I guess OSAM uses an IMU fed to a Gumstix which runs some other
> code to get PHI, PSI, THETA then feed that into estimator?
> 
> I'm really hoping that if estimator can simply be directly fed PHI, PSI,
> THETA from whatever source then you can fly. So maybe
> 1) Overo Water (I already have) +
> 2) Booz IMU (I already have) +
> 3) Some code ((I do not have)
> Might produce good PHI, PSI, THETA to feed estimator that will fly? I
> still lack the understanding if estimator if given good PHI, PSI, THETA can 
> fly
> or is it more complex.
> 
> Again please excuse my ignorance on these things. I really have valued
> your time to reply so far everyone. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> David Conger
> Onefastdaddy
> 001-858-775-3613
> Web: http://www.onefastdaddy.com
> email: address@hidden
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 02, 2010, at 11:49 AM, "Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers"
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > The sensors used by Booz and HB-Autopilot (ADXRS610)  have higher
> vibration resistance  and lower drifts.
> > You can also use Spakfun PCBs with the adxRS610 and glue them together
> to a cube . But this is expensive about 180 Euros.
> > The first sensors  LISY300AL  used by the diydrohnes project had poor
> vibrations resistance.
> > The Razor IMU has new sensors with better performance. Also the new
> IMUSENSE sensors have good performances to fly quadcopters and
> > normal planes. If you want to fly with  MEMS you must look that you have
> fully balanced the drive train (propellers).
> > Sometimes it is necessary to damp vibrations by the use of rubber mounts
> or foam.
> >
> > The advertange of the DCM algorithm introduced by William Premerlani and
> Paul Bizard is that they also take the centrifugal forces into account in
> > correcting the  gyro drift and to correct the orthogonallity of the DCM.
> Both are scientists and no hobbyist and wrote easy to understand documents
>  and take matlab simulations before going to the C code. Also a EKF was
> implemented.
> >
> > If very closer circles are flown with high speed the range of the
> acceleration sensors has to be extended.
> > Booz and HB-Autopilot can measure up to 5g. The new  HB autopilot  can
> measure  up to 6g. The RazzorIMU can measure up to 3g.
> > There is no  limitation  on the  speed.
> >  
> > The diydrohens project works first as paparazzi  wiht IR-Sensors and 
> AVR processors.  The community is very active:
> > normal planes, quadrocopters and helicopters.
> > Most of the hardware is sealed by Sparkfun.
> > You can by a IMU with processor for 99$  with  the same algorithms.
> > http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=9956
> > In the actual version 1.7  also pressure  measurement and magnetometer
> signals  are taken into account.
> > It is also possible to use this system with the paparazzi Towg. There is
> a comment in the paparazzi  wiki..
> >
> > Regards
> > Heinrich
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > David Conger schrieb:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Thank you CHristophe (and Dr. Warmers). This explanation below raises
> another question then. How are the UAV Devboard guys able to do it? Here is
> the link to the UAV Dev Board main page:
> http://code.google.com/p/gentlenav/wiki/MatrixPilot
> >>
> >> One of their users flies a FunJet > 100mph, not in a straight line
> only, quite well with the DCM code. How is this possible from a project so new
> by someone with no experience with UAV before?
> >>
> >> It should be noted that the code for the DIY is a simpler version of
> the orig. code from the UAV Devboard so maybe better results would come from
> code more like the UAV Devboard and not the DIY IMU. 
> >>
> >> I want to help, try out code, fly, ask programmers I work with to take
> a look... but I don't want to use DIY code and still use IR to fly fixed
> wing. I also can not afford a 2000.00 IMU. To me Booz is fine because  anyone
> can assemble one or have one assembled from available plans or it can be
> purchased for about the same price as a VT100. I do not get the feeling
> having a 100.00 IMU will make all the difference. It's the lack of actually
> being able to do it or that it's not widely done with any IMU that seems to
> get the complaints from people I interact with. They simply point to the UAV
> Devboard and DIY for the examples.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >> On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Christophe De Wagter wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The AHRS works fine as long as there are no long-lasting kinematic
> accelerations. An airplane however does accelerate very often for a long time:
> for instance when making something as simple as a turn. This is a big
> problem for "Inertial/Magnetic-Only" AHRS. For quadrotors, as long as you 
> hover
> or move slowly and always keep your nose in the same direction, these
> sensors are sufficient. For aircraft you NEED to compensate for kinematic
> accelerations. This is why either airspeed of GPS is required in order to make
> the filter stay within the +/-10 degree error range like thermopiles. 
> >>>
> >>> The code in the HW branch uses this type of filter as was written by
> diydrones. 
> >>>
> >>> If the Raisor IMU can be converted to accept GPS data, it could do the
> full computation. Once reliable attitude data is available, like you say:
> "it can simply be copied to the estimator variables" 
> >>>
> >>> If you run for instance the XSens Mti-G Module (with internal GPS and
> barometer for kinematic conpensations), that is exactly what happens. 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Christophe
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:16 AM, David Conger <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     Hello,
> >>>
> >>>     I took a look at the HW branch code today. Am I correct when I
> think the HW code in razor_imu is bypassing the DCM code on the Razor and just
> using the ADC outputs and then calculating the Euler Angles in the
> Autopilot. Then feeding them to estimator. 
> >>>
> >>>     Since the Razor is an AHRS already can't the outputs from the AHRS
> just be fed to estimator directly? Just over SPI feel the Euler Angles
> output into:
> >>>     From estimator.c 
> >>>     /* attitude in radian */
> >>>     float estimator_phi;
> >>>     float estimator_psi;
> >>>     float estimator_theta;
> >>>
> >>>     I also see the wiring diagram in the HR branch shows IR sensors
> are still used alongside the Razor IMU. Is this because it's difficult to
> remove the IR code? 
> >>>
> >>>     -David
> >>>
> >>>     On Sep 1, 2010, at 6:30 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>     Germar, Have a look at the post by Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich
> Warmers on 23 July 2010.
> >>>>     He has tested a low cost Sparkfun IMU ( RAZZOR IMU 6DOF Razor -
> Ultra-Thin IMU) with the paparazzi hardware.
> >>>>
> >>>>     From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
> David Carlson
> >>>>     Sent: Wednesday, 1 September 2010 1:53 PM
> >>>>     To: address@hidden
> >>>>     Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] AHRS over SPI on Tiny
> >>>>
> >>>>     Contact hwarm or check out his branch in svn.  I believe they
> have this IMU working with the autopilot already.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Buzz
> >>>>
> >>>>     On 09/01/2010 09:31 AM, Germar Walter wrote:
> >>>>     Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>     We are building a fixedwing Aircraft with tiny board.
> >>>>     We want to replace the Thermopiles with a AHRS System. We have
> purchased the Sparkfun9DOF Razor IMU. On the IMU we are directly calculating
> eulerian angles via the code provided by
> http://code.google.com/p/sf9domahrs/source/list.
> >>>>     We have activated the SPI interface on the board to communicate
> with the paparazzi.
> >>>>     Has anybody done something similar or knows how to use the angles
> for roll and pitch for stbilization? The code from the gyro.c only takes
> analogue measurements, but since We have a digital interface we don't want
> to convert to analogue just to convert back on the paparazzi.
> >>>>
> >>>>     cheers
> >>>>     Germar
> >>>>
> >>>>      
> >>>>      
> >>>>     _______________________________________________
> >>>>     Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> >>>>     address@hidden
> >>>>     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >>>>       
> >>>>
> >>>>     _______________________________________________
> >>>>     Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> >>>>     address@hidden
> >>>>     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     _______________________________________________
> >>>     Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> >>>     address@hidden
> >>>     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> >>> address@hidden
> >>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >>   
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

-- 
GMX DSL SOMMER-SPECIAL: Surf & Phone Flat 16.000 für nur 19,99 &euro;/mtl.!*
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl