[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-devel] Re: P.S.
From: |
Chris Cox |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-devel] Re: P.S. |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:44:42 -0800 |
I believe he is referring to JPEG-HDR, not (unused, rarely implemented) 12 bit
JPEG.
See Greg's publications on the matter for more details.
Chris
On 1/11/09 12:12 PM, "Thomas Richter" <address@hidden> wrote:
Greg Ward wrote:
> I have improved versions of Mark's images, regenerated from the RAW
> input using dcraw and hdrgen. Mark used Photoshop CS2 to create his
> HDR, and there are issues with their calibration resulting from that.
Well, if we can use those for testing, I would be definitely interested.
> Also, are you folks looking to evaluate JPEG-HDR in your comparisons? I
> can provide you with the library if you like.
You mean the 12bpp option in "traditional" JPEG? Well, sure, but not in
this test - that's done already - I'm currently looking into floating
point support, and for that into images that really need more range than
12bpp could address.
I do have the IJG code, which supports 12bpp lossy as a compile-time
option (unfortunately, somewhat buggy, but fixable); I suppose this is
what you mean?
Thanks,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
Message not available
Re: [Openexr-devel] Conditions for OpenEXR example images, Piotr Stanczyk, 2009/01/12