Weston Houghton wrote:
I realize that at this point it is beside the point, but isn't DNG
based on TIFF, of which Adobe (Aldus) still owns a number of patents
related to? While perhaps not more proprietary, doesn't that make DNG
slightly more dangerous to deal with?
I checked the USPTO came up with two unrelated patents for TIFF filed
by
ADOBE, and zero patents for TIFF filed by ALDUS (which I found
surprising).
http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html
Furthermore, I could not find any active TIFF trademarks on file by
either Adobe or Aldus, and none that were related to imaging.
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?
f=toc&state=6m1633.1.1&p_search=searchstr&Search+History=&p_L=100&p_plu
ral=no&p_s_PARA1=TIFF&p_tagrepl%7E%3A=PARA1%24ALL&expr=PARA1+or+PARA2&p
_s_PARA2=&p_tagrepl%7E%3A=PARA2%24ALL&a_default=search&a_search=Submit+
Query
Finally, I failed to find anything on DNG or Digital Negatives
filed by ADOBE. I'm starting to wonder about the USPTO search
engine and/or my search methods .....
So unless I missed something (??), only TIFFs which are encoded
(LZW/RLE/etc) present possible patent issues.
Just curious. that and the yearly small modifications that Adobe
seems to enjoy making to TIFF.
Arguably, this is a fundamental issue (not necessarily bad) with
the flexibility of TIFF.
Niles Ritter also maintains an Unofficial TIFF FAQ, which has
been helpful in the past for finding information:
http://home.earthlink.net/~ritter/tiff/
...
Hope some of that helps....
-[dg]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Derek Gerstmann address@hidden
MSc Computer Animation NCCA - Bournemouth University
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=