On 12/10/2019 04:38 AM, "Markus Mützel" wrote:
Am 10. Dezember 2019 um 11:58 Uhr schrieb "Kai Torben Ohlhus":
My personal expectation is no 6.1 release before February 2020 [3]. But
as 5.1.0 is already long time ago, I vote for another 5.2.0 stable
release before Christmas, followed by efforts to release 6.1.0. On the
stable branch, there are
hg log -r "release-5-1-0:" -b stable | grep "changeset" | wc -l
104 more or less important changes accumulated over 10 months users are
waiting for. This stable release does not need that much effort [1], as
it is stable, and I can prepare the stable branch for 5.2.0. Opinions?
I personally don't know how I feel about a 5.2 release. There probably are bugs
in the stable branch that haven't been there in Octave 5.1 and that have been
fixed on the development branch only (e.g. bug #55908 [1]).
We are not many developers. So I don't know whether we shouldn't better spend
our limited time to get the default branch ready instead of fixing issues on
the soon to be deprecated current stable branch.
But I won't hold anyone back if we agree on delaying Octave 6 for another dot
release.
A new stable release should be very easy and thus not distracting for core
developers. I have no objection if we do it, nor any strong leaning to do
it. If it exposes new bugs, they will be fixed by the the 6.1 release in
another month or so.