Re: Willing to work for octave.

[fgnievinski]

The missing functions seemed like a good idea, 

but without showing the list itself, it becomes 

a circular problem.

How about writing test cases for existing functions?

Would any of them benefit from more testing?

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Juan Pablo Carbajal-2 [via Octave] <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Carnë Draug <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I really don't think this is a good project. While the coding part may be
> simple, it requires to know how packages are, and what is needed by users
> and developers.

What better place to start to know the Octave community? Easy to code
you do not dig immediately in the complexity and in the meanwhile you
pick up style, requirements, preferences, etc.
Anyways I am not trying to convince you, but I think you might be
biased because you have been working in Octave for long already. I
have found that an experience developer sometimes is the last guy you
want to ask for advice on where to start.

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Willing-to-work-for-octave-tp4660415p4660875.html

To unsubscribe from Willing to work for octave., click here.
NAML

---

View this message in context: Re: Willing to work for octave.
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.