[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: after 3.2
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: after 3.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:54:24 +0100 |
Am Donnerstag, den 12.03.2009, 21:42 +0100 schrieb Jaroslav Hajek:
> I think it will be better if more people are able to transplant
> patches to the stable series, because often you can simultaneously
> apply a fix to both development and stable series. Unless Savannah
> allows a project to have more than one repo, the easiest way I see is
> to again introduce branches within the main repo.
I don't have a problem with adding more people to committer status of
the 3-x branch at tw-math.de.
That said, is there really a need to have two branches, stable and
development? It seems the Linux kernel works quite nicely with just one
branch.
Thomas
- after 3.2, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/12
- Re: after 3.2, Søren Hauberg, 2009/03/12
- Re: after 3.2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/12
- Re: after 3.2,
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: after 3.2, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/13
- Re: after 3.2, Thomas Weber, 2009/03/13
- Re: after 3.2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Bill Denney, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Thomas Weber, 2009/03/15