[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deprecated functions
From: |
Jason Riedy |
Subject: |
Re: deprecated functions |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:20:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
And Jaroslav Hajek writes:
> But it would break backward and Matlab compatibility in a fairly
> invasive way (infinitely more than the recently discussed NaN issues),
> so I think a wide agreement is really necessary here.
I don't have a Matlab(TM) license and haven't used it in quite
some time, so I can't verify that... I'm shocked but not too
surprised given their market moves.
However, such compatibility would render Octave far less useful
to me. I use Octave for executable code that can be published
directly[1]. Having to obscure my code for a system (Matlab(TM))
that I don't use and have no intention of using would be awful.
Jason
Footnotes:
[1] For example, see LAPACK Working Note 203 (to appear in SISC).
- Re: deprecated functions, (continued)
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/05
- Re: deprecated functions,
Jason Riedy <=
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04