[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?)
From: |
Daniel Rich |
Subject: |
Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?) |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:01:43 -0800 |
That's already in there -- that's what is bothering me. I have the port 80
check on localhost that is supposed to trigger a restart but it isn't
triggering. If that doesn't trigger then neither will the "if 2 restarts within
2 cycles" block. I even tried changing the order by moving the localhost port
80 check before the "does not exist" check, but that makes no difference.
check process apache with pidfile /var/run/httpd.pid
start program = "/etc/init.d/httpd start"
stop program = "/etc/init.d/httpd stop"
if does not exist
then exec "/bin/bash -c 'if [ ! -f /tmp/monit.apachedown ]; then touch
/tmp/monit.apachedown; /usr/bin/monit stop ospfd; fi'"
else if recovered then exec "/bin/bash -c 'rm /tmp/monit.apachedown &&
/usr/bin/monit monitor ospfd'"
if failed host localhost port 80 protocol http
and request "/" then restart
if children > 50 then restart
if 2 restarts within 2 cycles then timeout
group server
depends on tomcat
On Dec 14, 2011, at 00:30, Eric Pailleau wrote:
> Hello,
> In addition to pidfile check, you may add a tcp 80 (or another depending what
> apache is binding) check,
> or better a http page check (check host not in the pidfile paragraph).
> This will better check that your apache is up and running.
> This way you can do a simple apache restart on the second check ? But be
> carefull on dependencies.
>
> regards.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
Dan Rich <address@hidden> | http://www.employees.org/~drich/
| "Step up to red alert!" "Are you sure, sir?
| It means changing the bulb in the sign..."
| - Red Dwarf (BBC)
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), (continued)
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), Martin Pala, 2011/12/07
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), drich, 2011/12/07
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), Eric Pailleau, 2011/12/07
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), drich, 2011/12/07
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), Martin Pala, 2011/12/07
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), drich, 2011/12/07
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), Eric Pailleau, 2011/12/08
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), drich, 2011/12/08
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), drich, 2011/12/13
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), Eric Pailleau, 2011/12/14
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?),
Daniel Rich <=
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), Eric Pailleau, 2011/12/14
- Re: Monit dependency problem (bug?), drich, 2011/12/15