[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details]
From: |
Alessandro Vesely |
Subject: |
Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:24:24 +0100 |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:30:01 +0100
> > From: Alessandro Vesely <address@hidden>
> >
> > Currently, in find_and_set_default_shell (main.c) when the SHELL variable
> > or default shell ends with "cmd.exe" or similar variant, it is explicitely
> > accepted. Hence this point should be fixed already.
>
> Sorry, I'm not following you. Could you please elaborate: what is the
> problem with accepting cmd.exe?
There is no problem. (Except it is not unixy.) I think thaty code is relatively
new and perhaps the need-to-set-SHELL problem David was complaining abaut has
been fixed by it.
> > Because "command.com" is not considered, behaviour is different for win9x.
>
> Are you saying that command.com should be treated the same as cmd.exe?
> If so, I agree.
Yes, it should. But then also for all known non-unixy shell.
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], (continued)
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/04
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/04
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/05
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/06
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/06
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/06
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/06
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/06
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/07
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/07
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details],
Alessandro Vesely <=
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/08
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/08
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Earnie Boyd, 2005/03/08
- Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/09
- Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/09
- Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/10
- Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript fordetails], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/10
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/09
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], J. Grant, 2005/03/09
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/09