[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip |
Date: |
Thu, 18 May 2017 14:06:32 +0200 |
Sandeep wrote:
> Could you please give me a rough figure of how much RAM it may
> use, just to know whether it is viable in the above said system?
The most consuming part is that TLS requires 16 kByte per direction and
connection as encrypt/decrypt buffer.
As modern web browsers open multiple connections (~6?), that means you need >=
192 Byte only for TLS.
Of course that can be stripped down, but that's additional work to do.
Simon
- [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Sandeep V.L., 2017/05/17
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Antoine Zen-Ruffinen, 2017/05/17
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Noam Weissman, 2017/05/17
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, address@hidden, 2017/05/17
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Noam Weissman, 2017/05/17
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Sandeep, 2017/05/18
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Noam Weissman, 2017/05/18
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Simon Goldschmidt, 2017/05/18
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Jan Menzel, 2017/05/18
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, address@hidden, 2017/05/18
- Re: [lwip-users] HTTPS support in lwip, Jan Menzel, 2017/05/18