[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ...
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ... |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:51:36 +0100 |
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 08:24 -0400, Bill Auerbach wrote:
> Since this threading problem comes up weekly it seems, would it be a
> lot of effort to add an LWIP_MULTITHREADED option
Probably not, but I'd rather not for two reasons:
1) It would probably be a lot of effort to support it, as it would
undoubtedly throw up lots of other problems or issues, and people might
need help getting it working. lwIP is already pretty short on
development resource and has more pressing priorities.
2) It's low on the priorities as it doesn't fit well with the
lightweight goal of lwIP, and there is usually a better way to achieve
the same result.
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Teratux, 2010/06/21
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Teratux, 2010/06/21
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., address@hidden, 2010/06/21
- RE: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Kesten, Joerg, 2010/06/22
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Simon Goldschmidt, 2010/06/22
- RE: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Bill Auerbach, 2010/06/22
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Teratux, 2010/06/22
- RE: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Bill Auerbach, 2010/06/22
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., address@hidden, 2010/06/22
- Re: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ..., Teratux, 2010/06/23
- RE: [lwip-users] multithreaded app ...,
Kieran Mansley <=