[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:25:00 +0000 |
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 10:01 +0100, Hervé GARAT : Audemat wrote:
> However the message sent is long as p->tot_len, therefore the TCP
> checksum is Incorrect!!
Here's an possibility: when your driver sends the packet, does it just
send p->tot_len byte starting from p->payload? That would be wrong. It
must send p->len byte from p->payload, and then do the same for p->next,
and so on, until it has sent p->tot_len in total.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, herve garat, 2009/11/16
- [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- Re: RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Kieran Mansley, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Kieran Mansley, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation,
Kieran Mansley <=
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17