[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation
From: |
Hervé GARAT : Audemat |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:31 +0100 |
Sorry, but yersteday I thought that my first mail adress does not work well,
cause I did not get an answer and I wrote the same message with a new mail
adress. I'm newbie in mailing list, sorry again!
My problem append when I use the pbuf_cat function, and I use this only if
there is a communication problem.
When I look for the execution code in debug mode, when my problem append, so
LWIP go in pbuf_cat function and after inet_chksum calculate checksum with
p->len but the message which is sent is p->tot_len long! And wireshark says TCP
CHECKSUM INCORRECT and He's right!
When you go in pbuf_cat function, after the TCP Checksum is OK?
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden De la
> part de Simon Goldschmidt
> Envoyé : mardi 17 novembre 2009 10:11
> À : Mailing list for lwIP users
> Objet : Re: RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation
>
>
> Just sending a post a second time is normally not a way to attract much
> attention...
>
>
> "Hervé GARAT : Audemat" wrote:
> >
> > Kieran said:
> > >No, that's wrong. p->len refers to the length of each individual pbuf.
> > >We've added another pbuf to the chain, but not changed the length of
> > >each pbuf. Because the chain is longer, we increment the length of
> > >p->tot_len, but not the length of p->len.
> >
> > But in the inet_chksum_pseudo function,the len used to make checksum is
> > p->len and not p->tot_len. However the message sent is long as p-
> >tot_len,
> > therefore the TCP checksum is Incorrect!!
> >
> > All the other change that I made(queuelen--
> > ;pbuf_free(p->queuelen);...)are made to have a valid checksum if LWIP do
> a concatenation.
>
> As Kieran also said, the pbuf_free() is *wrong*, too.
>
> >
> > What's the best way to solve my problem?
>
> To be able to tell you that I would have to get your problem first. In my
> software, the same code path is executed and there is no error.
>
> Simon
> --
> DSL-Preisknaller: DSL Komplettpakete von GMX schon für
> 16,99 Euro mtl.!* Hier klicken: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users