[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:37:13 +0100 |
Did you read Kieran's response to your mail yesterday?
I also doubt the changes are correct and find it quite strange that it makes
things better, not worse.
Simon
"Hervé GARAT : Audemat" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I use the last CVS Head LWIP on LPC2468 with FreeRTOS. My embedded system
> communicates by IP with a PC. When the PC IP interfaces restart, I look for
> a checksum incorrect packet on Wireshark.
>
> This error seems to be a concatenate error. 172.17.2.173:my embedded
> system with LWIP; 172.17.2.172 : PC
>
> 111 7.819682 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=55493 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=209
> 112 7.825543 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=55702 Win=65535 Len=0
> 113 7.993714 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=55702 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=531
> 114 7.997536 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=56233 Win=65535 Len=0
> 115 8.211446 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [ACK] Seq=56233 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=1460
> 116 8.301504 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=57693 Win=65535 Len=0
> 117 8.326219 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=57693 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=197
> 118 8.333736 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=57890 Win=65535 Len=0
> 119 8.422016 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=57890 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=1126
> 120 8.429543 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=59016 Win=65535 Len=0
> 121 8.632683 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=59016 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=934
> 122 8.634010 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=59950 Win=65535 Len=0
> 123 8.869443 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [ACK] Seq=59950 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=1460 <- Restart of the
> PC IP interfaces
> 125 8.871878 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [ACK] Seq=61410 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=1460
> 129 8.874047 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=62870 Win=65535 Len=0
> 130 9.307578 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=62870 Ack=0 Win=5840 [TCP CHECKSUM INCORRECT]
> Len=740 <- this packet is a concatenation of the same packets than 111 and
> 113
> 131 9.309162 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [ACK] Seq=63610 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=1460
> 132 9.309293 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> [TCP Dup ACK 129#1] 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=62870 Win=65535 Len=0
> 142 9.789090 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=65070 Ack=0 Win=5840 [TCP CHECKSUM INCORRECT]
> Len=1323 <- this packet is a concatenation of the same packets than 117 and
> 119ss
> 153 10.003902 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=66393 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=934
> 156 10.019539 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> [TCP Dup ACK 129#2] 48955 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=0 Ack=62870 Win=65535 Len=0
> 157 10.905015 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> [TCP Retransmission] 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=62870 Ack=0 Win=5840 [TCP
> CHECKSUM INCORRECT] Len=740
> 158 13.209979 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [PSH, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=62870 Win=65535 Len=1
> 159 13.210040 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48955 > 5678 [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=62870 Win=65535 Len=0
> 160 13.210332 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48956 > 5678 [SYN] Seq=0 Len=0 MSS=1460 TSV=1711037 TSER=0 WS=6
> 161 13.241498 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48955 [ACK] Seq=67327 Ack=2 Win=5838 Len=0
> 162 13.279770 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> 5678 > 48956 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5840 Len=0 MSS=1460
> 163 13.279930 172.17.2.172 172.17.2.173 TCP
> 48956 > 5678 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=5840 Len=0
> 164 14.205872 172.17.2.173 172.17.2.172 TCP
> [TCP Retransmission] 5678 > 48955 [PSH, ACK] Seq=62870 Ack=2 Win=5838 [TCP
> CHECKSUM INCORRECT] Len=740
>
>
> In the pbuf_cat function "p->next" must not be equal to "t", but must be
> equal to "NULL". And we must write "p->len+=t->len;". And next after the
> call of "pbuf_cat(useg->p, queue->p);" in "tcp_enqueue fuction" tcp_out.c ,
> we have Add two line:
>
> pbuf_cat(useg->p, queue->p);
> useg->len += queue->len;
> useg->next = queue->next;
> LWIP_DEBUGF(TCP_OUTPUT_DEBUG | LWIP_DBG_TRACE | LWIP_DBG_STATE,
> ("tcp_enqueue: chaining segments, new len %"U16_F"\n", useg->len));
> if (seg == queue)
> {
> seg = useg;
> seglen = useg->len;
> queuelen--; //decrementation of the SND_QUEUELEN due
> to concatenation
> }
> memp_free(MEMP_TCP_SEG, queue);
> pbuf_free(queue->p); /dereference a pbuf chain due to concatenation
>
>
> Thanks to this modification I haven't a TCP CHECKSUM INCORRECT in
> wireshark and the communication works fine.
>
> Can you tell me if this modification are the best and if they will not
> be cause of a problem.
>
> Thanks In advance,
>
> Hervé GARAT
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
- [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, herve garat, 2009/11/16
- [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- Re: RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Kieran Mansley, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Kieran Mansley, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Kieran Mansley, 2009/11/17
- RE: [lwip-users] Checksum Incorrect caused by Concatenation, Hervé GARAT : Audemat, 2009/11/17