[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found
From: |
Leon Woestenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:25:58 +0100 |
Hello Chris,
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 03:38, Chris Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:37:20PM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> > I know that the "c16x" port is reasonably up to date, because Christiaan
> > did some testing the last
> > weeks. Use it as an example if you need to modify your side of the API.
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but it looks like most of the c16x port
> hasn't been touched in a couple years, except for the cs8900 interface
> that was updated just a few weeks ago. Am I seeing this correctly?
Yes, like I said, the API has changed minimally, i.e. it was quite good
from the start.
The c16x port works, and has been kept up-to-date with the API (no
recent changes there).
We don't fix things that aren't broke. (We only break new things :-).
Regards,
Leon.
- [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, Chris Frost, 2004/11/27
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, K.J. Mansley, 2004/11/27
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, Chris Frost, 2004/11/27
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, Kieran Mansley, 2004/11/27
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, Chris Frost, 2004/11/27
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/11/28
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, Chris Frost, 2004/11/28
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found, christiaan . simons, 2004/11/29
- Re: [lwip-users] Building lwip and ip.h et al not being found,
Leon Woestenberg <=