[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Strategy for Halloween release
From: |
Vadim Zeitlin |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Strategy for Halloween release |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:09:17 +0200 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:00:12 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
GC> On 2015-10-10 20:06, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
GC> > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 19:57:34 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
GC> >
GC> > GC> On 2015-10-09 18:12, Greg Chicares wrote:
GC> > GC> [...]
GC> > GC> > assert consistent run order across all cells:
GC> > GC> > https://github.com/vadz/lmi/pull/1/files?w=1
GC> > GC> > (useful starting point for ensuring input consistency for group
quotes)
GC> > GC>
GC> > GC> Committed 20151010T1930Z, revision 6346.
GC> >
GC> > Thank you, I've updated https://github.com/vadz/lmi/pull/3 and will base
GC> > the is_okay_to_run_group_quote when it's finally ready (I don't promise it
GC> > for "today" any longer) on this code too.
GC>
GC> Can I first sneak in Kim's patch that swaps two "Summary" items?
Yes, AFAICS this patch shouldn't conflict with anything else. BTW, sorry
but something strange happened in PR 3 (I suspect I did something wrong,
but I have no idea what could it have been), so I've reopened it as PR 4.
GC> It pained me to step outside origin zero. I was tempted to write a
GC> function to map
GC> 0 -> "first"
GC> 1 -> "second"
GC> ...
GC> 8 -> "ninth"
GC> 9 -> "10th"
GC> j -> itoa(1+j) + std::string("th")
GC> but decided I didn't have enough time to restore order to the universe.
GC> (And that sketch is incomplete--e.g., for j=21 or j=32.)
For a fun exercise, try writing a similar function for a Slavic language
(paying attention to the following noun declension).
VZ
Re: [lmi] Strategy for Halloween release, Greg Chicares, 2015/10/11