lmi
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] Strategy for Halloween release


From: Vadim Zeitlin
Subject: Re: [lmi] Strategy for Halloween release
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:09:17 +0200

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:00:12 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

GC> On 2015-10-10 20:06, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
GC> > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 19:57:34 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
GC> > 
GC> > GC> On 2015-10-09 18:12, Greg Chicares wrote:
GC> > GC> [...]
GC> > GC> > assert consistent run order across all cells:
GC> > GC> >   https://github.com/vadz/lmi/pull/1/files?w=1
GC> > GC> >   (useful starting point for ensuring input consistency for group 
quotes)
GC> > GC> 
GC> > GC> Committed 20151010T1930Z, revision 6346.
GC> > 
GC> >  Thank you, I've updated https://github.com/vadz/lmi/pull/3 and will base
GC> > the is_okay_to_run_group_quote when it's finally ready (I don't promise it
GC> > for "today" any longer) on this code too.
GC> 
GC> Can I first sneak in Kim's patch that swaps two "Summary" items?

 Yes, AFAICS this patch shouldn't conflict with anything else. BTW, sorry
but something strange happened in PR 3 (I suspect I did something wrong,
but I have no idea what could it have been), so I've reopened it as PR 4.

GC> It pained me to step outside origin zero. I was tempted to write a
GC> function to map
GC>   0 -> "first"
GC>   1 -> "second"
GC> ...
GC>   8 -> "ninth"
GC>   9 -> "10th"
GC>   j -> itoa(1+j) + std::string("th")
GC> but decided I didn't have enough time to restore order to the universe.
GC> (And that sketch is incomplete--e.g., for j=21 or j=32.)

 For a fun exercise, try writing a similar function for a Slavic language
(paying attention to the following noun declension).

VZ

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]