[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:17:22 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
On 2010-06-27 11:35Z, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2010-06-27 11:02Z, Vaclav Slavik wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 08:15 +0000, Greg Chicares wrote:
>>> > In 'datum_sequence.hpp', are the value_cast<>() specializations
>>> necessary?
>>>
>>> For derived classes (payment_sequence and mode_sequence), I mean.
>>
>> It seems you're right
Until datum_sequence becomes abstract. Then it won't link without
specializations for leaf classes. Refactoring the old code to remove
the need for these specializations is looking better and better.
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, (continued)
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Greg Chicares, 2010/06/26
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/06/26
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Greg Chicares, 2010/06/26
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/06/26
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Greg Chicares, 2010/06/26
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/06/27
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Greg Chicares, 2010/06/27
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Greg Chicares, 2010/06/27
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/06/27
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Greg Chicares, 2010/06/27
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords,
Greg Chicares <=
- Re: [lmi] sequence input editor -- how to get accepted keywords, Vaclav Slavik, 2010/06/27