Re: [Linphone-users] Problem with app for IOS

[Greg Troxel]

Dominic <address@hidden> writes:

> I have so much time invested in customizing Linphone, and I
> really do like the platform. I would hate to abandon it over
> something that should be fixable. I wouldn't mind personally
> digging in to the code to try to integrate some of Juha's ideas,
> but it doesn't seem like the devs are very open to outside
> contributions right now. I imagine this would be a big change too
> because there is a lot of code in LinphoneService.java around
> background issues.

You could maintain a friendly fork, where your changes are planned to go
upstream someday.   This could be a lot of git wrangling, but I wonder
about cloning and leaving the development branch as is, and then making
feature branches as necessary, rebasing them when convenient, and having
an integration branch which is upstream development branch plus feature
branches.  I did something sort of like this once (in a different
context, for a different reason), but it basically worked well git wise.

As for the change, if turning push on and then off makes background
calls work, it seems that there is just some missing initialization to
set up the background socket right on boot, and that's only done on
deconfiguring push.  Really if the push registration is not successful
this should happen automatically, and the push checkbox should only be
used to say "don't even try push, even if it seems to work".

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature