Re: Articulations in Separate Voice

[Valentin Petzel]

Hello Greg,
Maybe something like this?

Cheers,
Valentin

Am Freitag, 7. Jänner 2022, 22:05:23 CET schrieb Gregory Hollands:
> Lukas,
> 
> This solution sounds ideal.
> I would prefer to add the articulations directly to the music and just
> filter them out when necessary.
> 
> -Greg
> 
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 3:13 PM Lukas-Fabian Moser <lfm@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Gregory,
> > 
> > > My goal is to be able to turn articulations on and off easily,
> > > especially for different versions of the same score.
> > > 
> > > Questions
> > > 1. Is this the best way to separate articulations from the melody?
> > > 2. Is there a better way to turn articulations on and off?
> > > 3. How do I avoid collisions between the articulations and the note
> > 
> > stems?
> > 
> > I think I'd just add the articulations directly to the music and filter
> > them out at a later stage. It's not hard to write a scheme function
> > that, for example, removes articulations of given types (here
> > downbow/upbow), and there were similar examples recently on this list.
> > (A recent change I made to LilyPond itself made that still easier, but
> > these will only be available publicly when 2.23.6 is released.)
> > 
> > Before I give an example: Would this method be acceptable for you?
> > 
> > Lukas

removy.ly
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.