Re: 2.21 note definition change

[Paul Scott]

On 6/23/20 2:23 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Scott <waterhorse@ultrasw.com> writes:
>
> > The 1st argument for note is now a duration rather than a string.
> >
> > I had some scheme definitions which were variations on \tempo.
> >
> > I used (string?) for this value before.  What is the new scheme
> > equivalent?  (duration?)
> ly:duration?

Thank you, David.

I believe I had tried that.

Here's my MWE which hopefully will show someone what dumb mistake I'm 
making:

\version "2.21.2"

#(define-markup-command (notetest layout props dur) (ly:duration?)
  interpret-markup layout props
  (markup
   #:note dur #up
 ))

{
  \tempo \markup{ Allegro \notetest #4 }
  c'1
}

Thank you,

Paul