Re: 2.21 note definition change

[David Kastrup]

Paul Scott <waterhorse@ultrasw.com> writes:

> The 1st argument for note is now a duration rather than a string.
>
> I had some scheme definitions which were variations on \tempo.
>
> I used (string?) for this value before.  What is the new scheme
> equivalent?  (duration?)

ly:duration?

> I have been searching the LilyPond docs and scheme code without
> success so far.

The appendices of the Notation Reference contain lists of predicates.

-- 
David Kastrup